On Aug 23, 1:54 pm, Dale E
> ...@ wrote:
> > On Aug 21, 5:25 pm, "Jim"
>
> >>"You"
>
> >>news: @ ...
>
> >>>In article
> >>>"Paul F. Dietz"
>
> >>>> NaCl + 1/4 O2 + 1/2 H2O --> NaOH + 1/2 Cl2
>
> >>>Been a while since you did any Chemistry....
>
> >>>it should read....
>
> >>> 4 NaCl + O2 + 2 H2O --> 4 NaOH + 2 Cl2 + H2
>
> >>>All chemical formulas are integer based.....
>
> >> Wow. Even I knew that. But then, what do you expect from someone who
> >>gives Neon John grief about stuff....
>
> > Debating aside, how did this guy induce a radio frequency to break the
> > hydrogen bonds? With enough energy can this frequency actually break
> > chemical bonds?
>
> What is the amount of energy into the RF device at the wall outlet and
> what is the amount of heat energy released with the combustion?
>
> (I'm assuming this discussion has something to do with a video I
> watched where this orange flame came out of this container of salt water.)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I know its not perpetual motion. It took energy to release energy.
Amazing that it is un-documented that you can break bonds by high
frequency (domestically that is)... or is it documented? I missed that
one in college.